Why Financial Guarantees Became a Tax Flashpoint: Providing a corporate guarantee to a bank on behalf of your subsidiary was never considered a “service” attracting GST – until Schedule I Entry 2 and Rule 28(2) made it taxable. Since October 2023, every related-party corporate guarantee faces 18% GST on 1% of the guarantee amount annually. On a ₹100 crore guarantee: ₹1 crore value → ₹18 lakh GST per year. Combined with transfer pricing obligations (ALP guarantee fee to be charged between group companies), TDS on guarantee fees, FEMA compliance for cross-border guarantees, and income tax deductibility questions – financial guarantees have become one of India’s most complex multi-tax compliance areas. This guide covers every dimension.
📋 Table of Contents
- Types of Financial Guarantees – Overview
- GST Taxability of Guarantees – The Legal Framework
- GST Rule 28(2) – Corporate Guarantee by Related Party (1% Valuation)
- CBIC Circular 225/19/2024 – All Key Clarifications
- ITC (Input Tax Credit) on Corporate Guarantee Fee
- Income Tax – Guarantee Fee as Income and Deduction
- Transfer Pricing – Arm’s Length Price for Group Guarantees
- TDS on Guarantee Fee
- Personal Guarantee by Directors – GST & Income Tax
- Bank Guarantee – GST Treatment
- Performance Guarantee – GST Treatment
- FEMA on Guarantees – Cross-Border Compliance
- GST vs Transfer Pricing – Value Mismatch Issue
- Practical Case Studies
- Frequently Asked Questions
1. Types of Financial Guarantees – Overview
| Type | Who Gives It | Purpose | GST Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Guarantee (related party) | Parent/holding company → bank, on behalf of subsidiary | Subsidiary gets loan; parent’s creditworthiness backs the loan | TAXABLE – Rule 28(2): 18% GST on 1% of guarantee amount p.a. (from 26 Oct 2023) |
| Corporate Guarantee (unrelated party) | Third-party company guaranteeing another company’s loan | Commercial guarantee; fee charged at market rate | TAXABLE – 18% GST on actual consideration charged |
| Bank Guarantee (BG) | Bank guarantees its customer’s obligation to a beneficiary | Performance, payment, advance payment, bid security | TAXABLE – 18% GST; bank pays on commissions charged; SAC 998113 |
| Performance Guarantee | Contractor/company guarantees performance of a contract | Construction, supply, service contracts; public projects | TAXABLE – 18% on premium/commission charged; specific works contract rules may apply |
| Personal Guarantee by Director | Individual director/promoter guaranteeing company’s loan to bank | Bank comfort; promoter’s personal assets backing company loan | Controversial – see Section 9; individual in personal capacity may not be in “course of business” |
| Letter of Comfort (LOC) | Parent company sends letter of comfort to bank for subsidiary | Softer moral commitment; not a binding legal guarantee | May or may not be a “supply” – depends on whether binding; detailed analysis needed |
| Counter Guarantee | Main guarantor gives counter guarantee to bank after bank gives BG | Bank issues BG to beneficiary; main guarantor protects bank from claim | TAXABLE supply between bank and guarantor |
| Deferred Payment Guarantee | Bank guarantees installment payments by buyer to seller | Equipment/capital goods purchase on deferred payment | TAXABLE – 18% on commission/guarantee fee |
2. GST Taxability of Guarantees – The Legal Framework
Schedule I, Entry 2, CGST Act – Deemed Supply Even Without Consideration:
“Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business” is a supply under GST even if made without any consideration. This is the foundational provision that makes intra-group corporate guarantees taxable – even when no guarantee fee is charged.
“Supply of goods or services or both between related persons or between distinct persons as specified in section 25, when made in the course or furtherance of business” is a supply under GST even if made without any consideration. This is the foundational provision that makes intra-group corporate guarantees taxable – even when no guarantee fee is charged.
The taxability of corporate guarantees was confirmed even before October 2023. Rule 28(2) (inserted October 2023) addresses only the valuation – not the taxability. The taxability existed from day 1 of GST for related-party guarantees in the course of business. Circular 225/19/2024 confirmed this explicitly: “The taxability of Corporate guarantee can never be disputed. It was taxable even before 26th Oct 2023.”
| Service | SAC Code | GST Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Financial guarantee services (including corporate guarantees) | 998113 | 18% (IGST for inter-state; CGST + SGST for intra-state) |
| Bank guarantee services | 998113 | 18% |
| Other guarantee/financial services | 998119 | 18% |
Who pays GST on a corporate guarantee? The guarantor (the parent/holding company providing the guarantee) is the supplier of the service. The guarantor must issue a GST invoice to the recipient (subsidiary) for the guarantee service, collect GST, and pay to the government. If the guarantor is not GST-registered → must take GST registration for this taxable supply. If the guarantee is for a foreign related party (recipient outside India) → export of service; may be zero-rated with LUT.
3. GST Rule 28(2) – Corporate Guarantee by Related Party (1% Valuation)
3.1 What Rule 28(2) Says (Post July 2024 Amendment)
Rule 28(2), CGST Rules, 2017 (as amended w.e.f. 26 October 2023; amended 10 July 2024):
“The value of the supply of services by a supplier to a recipient who is a related person located in India, by way of providing a corporate guarantee to any banking company or financial institution on behalf of the said recipient, shall be deemed to be one percent of the amount of such guarantee offered per annum, or the actual consideration, whichever is higher.”
Proviso: Where the recipient is eligible to full input tax credit, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be the open market value.
“The value of the supply of services by a supplier to a recipient who is a related person located in India, by way of providing a corporate guarantee to any banking company or financial institution on behalf of the said recipient, shall be deemed to be one percent of the amount of such guarantee offered per annum, or the actual consideration, whichever is higher.”
Proviso: Where the recipient is eligible to full input tax credit, the value declared in the invoice shall be deemed to be the open market value.
3.2 Who It Applies To
- Supplier: The guarantor (parent company, group company, holding company)
- Recipient: A related person located in India (subsidiary, associate, group company within India)
- Guarantee: Corporate guarantee provided to a banking company or financial institution
- The guarantee benefits the recipient (who takes the loan backed by the guarantee)
- Related persons as per §2(105), CGST Act: parent-subsidiary, associated companies, persons having 25%+ common shareholding, directors/management control etc.
3.3 Exceptions – When Rule 28(2) Does NOT Apply
| Exception | Rule / Circular Basis | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Recipient is located outside India (guarantee for foreign subsidiary’s loan from foreign bank) | Rule 28(2) amended July 2024 – explicitly applies only to “related person located in India” | Rule 28(2) NOT applicable → export of service → zero-rated (with LUT) |
| Recipient is eligible for full ITC (i.e., recipient uses guaranteed loan entirely for taxable business) | Proviso to Rule 28(2) – invoice value deemed as open market value | Guarantor can issue invoice at any declared value; 1% floor does not bind |
| Guarantee provided before 26 October 2023 (and not renewed after) | Circular 225/19/2024 – old Rule 28 applies; valuation at arm’s length or actual value | Older valuation rules apply; specific analysis needed per transaction |
| Guarantee provided to a non-banking financial obligation (not a bank/FI) | Rule 28(2) applies only to guarantees given to “banking company or financial institution” | Rule 28(2) not applicable for non-bank guarantees; normal Rule 28 applies |
3.4 GST Calculation Example
Corporate Guarantee GST – Calculation
Alpha Ltd. (parent, Delhi) provides corporate guarantee to SBI for a ₹50 crore loan to Beta Ltd. (subsidiary, Delhi). No guarantee fee charged. Beta uses loan for taxable manufacturing business (eligible for ITC). Guarantee issued on 1 January 2024.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Guarantee amount | ₹50 crore |
| Rule 28(2) value (1% per annum) | 1% × ₹50Cr = ₹50 lakh per year |
| Actual consideration | ₹0 (no fee charged) |
| Value for GST | Higher of ₹50L or ₹0 = ₹50 lakh |
| GST @ 18% (intra-state: CGST 9% + SGST 9%) | ₹9 lakh GST per year |
| Who issues invoice? | Alpha Ltd. (guarantor) issues tax invoice to Beta Ltd. for “corporate guarantee services” |
| Beta Ltd. eligible for full ITC? | Yes – Beta uses loan for taxable manufacturing → Beta can claim ₹9L as ITC |
| Net GST cost | If Beta claims full ITC: net GST cash cost = ₹0 (cash neutral) |
| Annual compliance | Alpha files GSTR-1 showing ₹50L taxable supply + ₹9L GST; files GSTR-3B and pays; Beta claims ITC in GSTR-3B |
Even if net GST cost is zero (ITC offset), the compliance burden is real – Alpha must issue invoices, file returns, pay GST, and Beta must claim ITC every year. Non-compliance (no invoice, no GST payment) creates GST demand + 24-36% interest + 100% penalty under §74.
4. CBIC Circular 225/19/2024-GST – All Key Clarifications
Circular No. 225/19/2024-GST dated 11 July 2024 provides comprehensive clarification on corporate guarantee taxability and valuation. Key points:
| Issue | Clarification |
|---|---|
| Was corporate guarantee taxable BEFORE 26 October 2023? | YES – Schedule I Entry 2 made it taxable from Day 1 of GST for related parties. Rule 28(2) only provides valuation mechanism, not taxability. |
| Which guarantees are covered by new Rule 28(2)? | Guarantees issued or renewed on or after 26 October 2023, to related persons located in India, for bank/FI loans. |
| What is the value for GST – guaranteed amount or loan disbursed? | Guaranteed amount – not actual loan disbursed. If guarantee is for ₹100Cr but only ₹60Cr is disbursed, GST is on 1% of ₹100Cr. |
| How is 1% calculated if guarantee is for less than a year? | Pro-rated: guarantee for 6 months = 0.5% of guarantee amount; for 3 months = 0.25% etc. |
| Co-guarantors – how is GST split? | GST payable proportionately – each co-guarantor pays GST on 1% of their portion of the guarantee amount. |
| Intra-group guarantees – who pays GST? | Guarantor entity pays GST on forward charge basis (normal GST payment, not RCM). |
| If guarantee is exported (recipient outside India)? | Rule 28(2) NOT applicable; treated as export of service; zero-rated with LUT. |
| If recipient is eligible to full ITC? | Invoice value declared by guarantor is deemed acceptable; 1% floor does not apply mandatorily. |
| Takeover of financial obligations (acquisition of borrower company)? | No fresh GST unless a new/fresh guarantee is issued at the time of takeover. |
| Can GST be charged on the same guarantee amount repeatedly each year? | Yes – 1% per annum means GST is charged every year the guarantee remains outstanding. |
| Existing guarantees (before 26 Oct 2023) – renewed after? | If renewed after 26 Oct 2023 → Rule 28(2) applies to the renewed guarantee from renewal date. |
⚠️ Don’t ignore past guarantees: If your company has given corporate guarantees to banks for subsidiary loans since FY 2023-24 (from October 2023) and has not issued GST invoices or paid GST – there is a live demand risk. GST + interest at 18% per annum + 100% penalty under §74 (if GST department treats it as fraud/suppression). Conduct a guarantee audit across your group immediately. File a voluntary disclosure/rectification with the GST department if amounts are significant.
5. ITC (Input Tax Credit) on Corporate Guarantee Fee
The recipient (subsidiary borrower) who receives the corporate guarantee service pays 18% GST on the guarantee value. Can this GST be claimed as ITC?
| Recipient’s Use of Loan | ITC on Guarantee Fee GST | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Loan used entirely for taxable supplies (manufacturing, trading, services) | Full ITC available | §16 CGST Act – ITC on inputs used for taxable supplies; the guarantee fee is an input service for the business |
| Loan used for exempt activities (e.g., land/building for residential letting) | No ITC (blocked under §17(5) for supplies exempt) | §17(2) proportionate reversal; or §17(5) if blocked credit category |
| Loan used partly for taxable, partly for exempt | Proportionate ITC (Rule 42 apportionment) | ITC in proportion of taxable turnover to total turnover |
| Loan used for non-business personal purposes | No ITC (§17(5)(g) – goods/services for personal consumption) | Personal use blocks ITC |
Planning opportunity – full ITC eligibility: If the subsidiary (recipient of the guarantee benefit) is engaged entirely in taxable activities and is eligible to claim full ITC, the effective cost of GST compliance is zero – the ₹9L GST paid on a ₹50Cr guarantee is immediately credited back as ITC. In such cases, the GST compliance is a cash flow timing issue (pay first, claim back), not a true cost. Ensure the invoice, ITC claim, and §16(2) matching are in order.
6. Income Tax – Guarantee Fee as Income and Deduction
6.1 For the Guarantor – Guarantee Fee as Taxable Income
- If the guarantor charges a guarantee fee → it is income in the guarantor’s hands, taxable at applicable income tax rates
- Characterisation: “Fees for technical services” OR “business income” depending on whether guarantor is in the business of providing guarantees
- For a holding company providing guarantees to subsidiaries as part of its treasury/investment function: typically “income from other sources” → taxable at slab rate
- For financial companies (NBFCs, banks) whose business includes providing guarantees: “business income”
6.2 For the Guarantee Recipient – Guarantee Fee as Deductible Expense
- Guarantee fee paid to guarantor is a deductible business expense under §34, ITA 2025 (= §37, ITA 1961) – the general “wholly and exclusively for business” deduction test – if paid for business purposes. Note: §37 in ITA 2025 is a different, unrelated provision (actual-payment-basis/MSME deductions, equivalent to old §43B) – the general deductibility test sits at §34, not §37, under the new numbering.
- Conditions: genuine transaction, not excessive/not disguised dividend, in the course of business, connected to the business loan
- Arm’s length pricing required if related party transaction (transfer pricing)
6.3 If Guarantee is Invoked – Guarantor Pays on Behalf of Subsidiary
- If the bank invokes the guarantee and the parent pays the bank → parent has a claim against subsidiary
- If the subsidiary later repays the parent → no income tax issue (recovery of payment made)
- If the subsidiary cannot repay → parent writes off the amount
- Write-off of invoked guarantee payment: deductible under §36(1)(vii) (bad debt) if originally treated as income, OR under §34, ITA 2025 (= §37, ITA 1961) if capital expenditure analysis applies (depends on facts)
- This area has significant litigation – each case depends on its specific facts
7. Transfer Pricing – Arm’s Length Price for Group Guarantees
Transfer Pricing obligation for intra-group guarantees:
When an Indian company provides a guarantee to a bank on behalf of an associated enterprise (AE – related party), this is an “international transaction” or “specified domestic transaction” under the Income Tax Act. The guarantee fee must be charged at Arm’s Length Price (ALP). If the ALP is higher than the fee actually charged (or zero if no fee charged) → Transfer Pricing adjustment by income tax authorities.
When an Indian company provides a guarantee to a bank on behalf of an associated enterprise (AE – related party), this is an “international transaction” or “specified domestic transaction” under the Income Tax Act. The guarantee fee must be charged at Arm’s Length Price (ALP). If the ALP is higher than the fee actually charged (or zero if no fee charged) → Transfer Pricing adjustment by income tax authorities.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| TP documentation required | Form 48 (ITA 2025) = Form 3CEB (ITA 1961) – CA-certified TP report; must include ALP analysis for guarantee transaction |
| Most common TP method for guarantees | CUP (Comparable Uncontrolled Price) – compare to market rate for similar guarantees |
| ALP guarantee fee range (typical) | 0.5% to 2% per annum of guarantee amount – depends on credit rating of borrower, guarantee term, industry sector, guarantee risk |
| GCA forms for APA on guarantee | Form 50 (ITA 2025) = Form 3CEC (APA pre-filing); Form 51 = Form 3CED (application); Form 52 = Form 3CEF (annual compliance) |
| Penalty for TP adjustment | 200% of tax on TP adjustment amount; 2% penalty on international transaction value if no Form 48 filed |
| Safe harbour for guarantees | Indian CBDT Safe Harbour Rules (2013, amended 2017): guarantee fee of minimum 1% of guarantee amount per annum is safe harbour for explicit corporate guarantees. This aligns with GST Rule 28(2) 1% rate – a notable convergence. |
GST-TP alignment for corporate guarantees: GST Rule 28(2) values the guarantee at 1% of amount p.a.; CBDT Safe Harbour for TP also sets 1% as the minimum safe harbour. This convergence means that charging 1% guarantee fee: (a) satisfies GST Rule 28(2) valuation, (b) qualifies for CBDT safe harbour under TP, and (c) creates deductible income/expense for both parties. Many large groups are now implementing documented 1% guarantee fee policies to comply with both GST and TP simultaneously. However, for low-risk borrowers with excellent credit ratings, the actual ALP might be below 1% – in which case the GST Rule 28(2) 1% minimum could exceed the TP ALP, creating a mismatch. See Section 13.
8. TDS on Guarantee Fee
| Transaction | TDS Provision (ITA 2025) | TDS Provision (ITA 1961) | Rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guarantee fee paid by Indian company to related Indian company | §393(1) Sl.No.6(iii) | § 194J | 2% (technical fees) or 10% (professional fees) – depends on characterisation | TAN required; Form 140 quarterly; Form 131 certificate |
| Guarantee fee paid to foreign parent/company (NR) | §393(2) | § 195 | Per DTAA rate or 20% (without DTAA); check “fees for technical services” article in relevant DTAA | Form 145 + Form 146 (ITA 2025) mandatory before remittance |
| Guarantee fee above ₹50L paid by individual/HUF (non-audit) | §393(1) Sl.No.6(ii) | § 194M | 2% | No TAN needed; Form 141 |
| Guarantee commission by bank to guarantor | §393(1) Sl.No.6(iii) | § 194J / §194C | 2% or 10% | Depends on nature of engagement |
9. Personal Guarantee by Directors – GST & Income Tax
The most common – and most misunderstood – guarantee situation in India:
Almost every SME promoter/director provides a personal guarantee to the bank when the company takes a business loan. This is a standard banking requirement. But does this attract GST? The answer depends on whether the director is acting in a personal capacity or in the course of business.
Almost every SME promoter/director provides a personal guarantee to the bank when the company takes a business loan. This is a standard banking requirement. But does this attract GST? The answer depends on whether the director is acting in a personal capacity or in the course of business.
| Scenario | GST Position | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Director/promoter provides personal guarantee to bank for company’s loan – as an individual, NOT in the course of business | Generally NOT taxable as GST supply | Schedule I Entry 2 requires supply “in the course or furtherance of business.” An individual providing a personal guarantee in their private capacity (not as a business activity) is generally not making a supply under GST. This is the dominant legal interpretation. |
| Director who is also a professional guarantor OR whose main business IS providing guarantees | TAXABLE – if providing guarantees is in the course of business | If the person is in the business of guaranteeing others’ loans → it’s a business supply |
| Director charged a guarantee fee by the company for personal guarantee | TAXABLE in the director’s hands as supply of service (fee = consideration) | Consideration makes it a clear taxable supply; director must issue GST invoice if registered |
| Invoked personal guarantee – bank recovers from director personally | Tax event for the company (director has a claim against the company as a creditor) | Income tax: company may deduct; director may claim loss if company doesn’t repay |
Best practice for director personal guarantees: (1) Ensure it’s clearly documented as a personal guarantee given in individual capacity, not in a professional/business capacity; (2) Do not charge any fee for the personal guarantee – consideration would make it a taxable supply; (3) If required by bank – issue a simple personal guarantee letter (not a formal commercial service agreement); (4) Review your income tax position – no immediate income tax on providing personal guarantee; income tax arises only if invoked and guarantee amount not recovered from company.
10. Bank Guarantee – GST Treatment
When a bank issues a Bank Guarantee (BG) to a beneficiary on behalf of its customer – this is a financial service. The bank charges a BG commission from its customer.
| Party | GST Position |
|---|---|
| Bank receiving BG commission from customer | Bank pays 18% GST on BG commission (as supplier of financial guarantee service). Bank issues tax invoice to customer. SAC: 998113. |
| Customer paying BG commission to bank | Customer can claim ITC on BG commission if the BG is for taxable business purposes (e.g., performance guarantee for a construction contract being executed). ITC blocked if for personal use or exempt supplies. |
| Beneficiary (recipient of BG) | Beneficiary does not pay GST – only receives the BG. No GST event on BG invocation (it’s a discharge of financial obligation, not a supply). |
| Counter guarantee by customer to bank | If customer gives a counter guarantee to bank (promising to indemnify bank if BG is invoked) – if this is a formal supply of services, it may attract GST. In practice, most counter indemnity obligations are not separately taxed. |
11. Performance Guarantee – GST Treatment
- Performance guarantee provided by a contractor as part of a construction/supply contract: the guarantee itself is typically embedded in the overall contract value – no separate GST on guarantee component; GST applies to the contract value
- If a separate premium/commission is charged for a standalone performance guarantee: 18% GST applies as financial/guarantee service
- Insurance company providing performance guarantee products: 18% GST on premium (treated as financial service, not general insurance)
- ECGC (Export Credit Guarantee Corporation): specific insurance/guarantee products; GST position depends on product type
12. FEMA on Guarantees – Cross-Border Compliance
| Cross-Border Guarantee Transaction | FEMA Position | Approval Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Indian company guaranteeing foreign subsidiary’s loan from foreign bank | FEMA (Guarantees) Regulations 2000 as amended – generally covered under Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) framework | Automatic route for bonafide business guarantees within ODI limits; approval for large amounts or specific categories |
| Indian company guaranteeing foreign parent’s obligation | RBI prior approval typically required – guarantee favouring a non-resident parent is not covered under standard automatic routes | Yes – RBI prior approval |
| Foreign parent company guaranteeing Indian subsidiary’s loan from Indian bank | FDI inflow equivalent; FEMA automatic route for non-resident support to Indian entity | Generally automatic – report to RBI within 30 days (FC-GPR or equivalent) |
| Indian individual director guaranteeing foreign entity’s obligation | Treated as overseas investment by individual; within LRS ($250K/year) limits | Within LRS limits: automatic; above LRS or personal guarantee for corporate: RBI approval |
| Bank giving BG to non-resident beneficiary | Banks follow RBI’s Master Direction on Guarantees – specific permissible categories for cross-border BGs | Depends on category – performance guarantees for exports: generally automatic |
⚠️ Cross-border guarantee without FEMA compliance: Providing a guarantee to a foreign entity without proper FEMA approval (where required) is a FEMA contravention – compounding with RBI + potential ED investigation under PMLA if large amounts. Always obtain a FEMA opinion from a qualified professional before providing any cross-border guarantee. Many companies discover this compliance requirement only when the guarantee is invoked and cross-border funds need to move.
13. GST vs Transfer Pricing – Value Mismatch Issue
The GST-TP Value Conflict:
GST Rule 28(2) sets a minimum value of 1% of guarantee amount per annum for corporate guarantees. CBDT’s Safe Harbour under TP also sets 1% as the minimum safe harbour for guarantee fee. This seems aligned – but problems arise when:
(a) For very low-risk borrowers (AAA rated, excellent financial health), the actual ALP under TP may be 0.25%–0.5% (not 1%). The TP authority may accept 0.5% as ALP; but GST insists on minimum 1%.
(b) GST treats the 1% as a “deemed value” even if full ITC is available; TP treats it as income recognition for the guarantor.
(c) If the GST invoiced amount (1%) is higher than the TP ALP (0.5%) – the excess 0.5% may be challenged by income tax as excessive guarantee fee (non-arm’s length income for guarantor or non-arm’s length deduction for recipient).
This mismatch creates a compliance trap: follow GST Rule 28(2) at 1% → TP challenge possible for the excess over ALP; charge at ALP below 1% → GST Rule 28(2) violation. The safest approach is to document ALP at ≥1% (which is within safe harbour) so both GST and TP are simultaneously satisfied.
GST Rule 28(2) sets a minimum value of 1% of guarantee amount per annum for corporate guarantees. CBDT’s Safe Harbour under TP also sets 1% as the minimum safe harbour for guarantee fee. This seems aligned – but problems arise when:
(a) For very low-risk borrowers (AAA rated, excellent financial health), the actual ALP under TP may be 0.25%–0.5% (not 1%). The TP authority may accept 0.5% as ALP; but GST insists on minimum 1%.
(b) GST treats the 1% as a “deemed value” even if full ITC is available; TP treats it as income recognition for the guarantor.
(c) If the GST invoiced amount (1%) is higher than the TP ALP (0.5%) – the excess 0.5% may be challenged by income tax as excessive guarantee fee (non-arm’s length income for guarantor or non-arm’s length deduction for recipient).
This mismatch creates a compliance trap: follow GST Rule 28(2) at 1% → TP challenge possible for the excess over ALP; charge at ALP below 1% → GST Rule 28(2) violation. The safest approach is to document ALP at ≥1% (which is within safe harbour) so both GST and TP are simultaneously satisfied.
14. Practical Case Studies
Case 1: Large Group – Retroactive GST Exposure Discovery
TechGroup Pvt. Ltd. (parent) gave corporate guarantees to Bank of India for ₹200 crore loans to its 3 subsidiaries in FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25. No GST was paid. Discovered in FY 2025-26.
| Year | Guarantee Amount | GST Rule 28(2) Value (1%) | GST @18% | Interest @18% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2022-23 (pre-Oct 2023 for 6 months) | ₹200Cr | Arm’s length valuation required (not Rule 28(2)); assume 0.5% ALP = ₹1Cr | ₹18L | ₹18L × 18% × 2yr = ₹6.5L |
| FY 2023-24 (Oct 2023–Mar 2024: 6 months) | ₹200Cr | 1% × ₹200Cr × 6/12 = ₹1Cr | ₹18L | ₹18L × 18% × 1.5yr = ₹4.9L |
| FY 2024-25 (full year) | ₹200Cr | 1% × ₹200Cr = ₹2Cr | ₹36L | ₹36L × 18% × 0.5yr = ₹3.2L |
| Total GST + Interest | ₹72L | ~₹14.6L |
Action: TechGroup should voluntarily disclose the shortcoming, issue tax invoices with backdated compliance, pay GST + interest to reduce penalty risk (voluntary disclosure reduces penalty from 100% to 10-25% under §73/74 CGST). Subsidiaries can claim ITC to reduce net group impact.
Case 2: Transfer Pricing + GST Simultaneous Compliance
ABC Holdings gives corporate guarantee to HDFC Bank for a ₹50 crore loan to its subsidiary XYZ Trading Pvt. Ltd. XYZ is 100% engaged in taxable trading. ABC wants to charge guarantee fee.
- TP ALP analysis: XYZ’s credit rating – BBB; similar guarantees in market: 0.8%–1.5% p.a. ALP = 1% p.a. (within safe harbour + market range)
- Documentation: Form 48 (ITA 2025) = Form 3CEB; ALP analysis documenting 1% as reasonable; contemporaneous TP documentation
- Guarantee fee charged: ₹50Cr × 1% = ₹50L per year
- GST Rule 28(2): Deemed value = 1% × ₹50Cr = ₹50L → same as fee charged. GST = 18% × ₹50L = ₹9L. ABC issues invoice for ₹50L + ₹9L GST.
- TDS by XYZ: XYZ deducts TDS at 10% (§194J / §393(1) Sl.No.6(iii) ITA 2025) on ₹50L = ₹5L. Deposits with govt. Issues Form 131 (old 16A) to ABC.
- XYZ claims ITC: ₹9L GST claimed as ITC in GSTR-3B (full ITC as 100% taxable activity). Net GST cost = ₹0.
- ABC income tax: ₹50L guarantee fee = taxable income for ABC. TDS credit ₹5L. Pay remaining tax.
- Fully compliant: GST + TP + TDS + income tax all satisfied simultaneously.
15. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. My company gave a corporate guarantee to a bank for my subsidiary’s loan in 2022. Do I owe GST now?
Yes, potentially on two fronts: (a) For guarantees issued before 26 October 2023 – GST was taxable under Schedule I Entry 2 (related party supply in course of business). The valuation was under the old Rule 28 (arm’s length value or transaction value). If no consideration was charged, the ALP analysis determines the value. (b) For guarantees issued/renewed on or after 26 October 2023 – Rule 28(2) applies: 1% per annum of guarantee amount is the minimum value, and 18% GST is payable on this. If you have been providing guarantees and not paying GST – conduct a guarantee audit immediately. Calculate GST for each year, prepare voluntary disclosure, issue backdated invoices, pay GST + interest, and claim §73 benefit (reduced 10% penalty for voluntary disclosure). Subsidiaries with full ITC eligibility can offset most of the cost. GCA can assist with the retroactive compliance exercise.
Q2. Does Rule 28(2) apply to letters of comfort (LOC)?
Not directly – Rule 28(2) specifies “corporate guarantee” provided to a “banking company or financial institution.” A Letter of Comfort is typically a moral/reputational commitment, not a binding guarantee that the bank can enforce. If the LOC is legally binding and can be enforced by the bank → it may be treated as a guarantee, attracting Rule 28(2). If the LOC is non-binding (mere “support letter”) → not a supply of guarantee services and Rule 28(2) would not apply. The characterisation depends on the specific language of the letter and whether it creates a legally enforceable obligation. Get a legal review of your LOC wording before concluding on GST treatment.
Q3. My subsidiary is a holding company and not eligible for ITC (because it only earns exempt dividends). How does Rule 28(2) affect it?
This is the most painful GST scenario for corporate guarantees. If the subsidiary (recipient of the guarantee) uses the loan for activities that are exempt (earning dividends, making exempt investments) → it has no ITC eligibility. The 18% GST on 1% of the guarantee amount becomes a real cash cost for the subsidiary. Example: Guarantee ₹100Cr → GST value ₹1Cr → GST ₹18L per year → subsidiary cannot claim ITC → ₹18L is an actual cash outflow annually. In such structures, you must evaluate whether the guarantee is commercially necessary and whether restructuring (e.g., convert guarantee to a different form of support, or restructure the subsidiary’s activities to include some taxable supplies) can reduce the GST cash cost. Consult GCA for structural alternatives.
Q4. How do I reconcile the GST Rule 28(2) 1% valuation with Transfer Pricing ALP?
This is the GST-TP mismatch issue. The safest approach: document your TP ALP at ≥1% of the guarantee amount (which is within the CBDT Safe Harbour range for explicit corporate guarantees). This way: (a) GST Rule 28(2) at 1% is satisfied – your actual fee equals the minimum Rule 28(2) value; (b) TP safe harbour at 1% is satisfied – no TP adjustment risk; (c) Both GST invoice and TP documentation reference 1% as the basis. If your TP analysis genuinely shows the ALP is below 1% (very high credit quality borrower), you face a conflict: Rule 28(2) forces 1% for GST, but TP ALP may be lower. Document clearly that the 1% is Rule 28(2)-driven for GST, and the TP ALP is separately substantiated. The possibility of the TP authority challenging the “excess” 0.5% (if ALP is 0.5% but you charge 1%) exists – get an APA (Advance Pricing Agreement via Form 50/51 ITA 2025) if large amounts are involved.
Corporate Guarantee GST Compliance, TP Documentation & FEMA Advisory — GCA
GCA provides end-to-end guarantee compliance advisory – retroactive GST Rule 28(2) compliance for past guarantees, transfer pricing documentation (Form 48 / Form 3CEB under ITA 2025), CBDT safe harbour analysis, FEMA compliance for cross-border guarantees, TDS on guarantee fees, and ITC optimisation for subsidiary borrowers. We handle the intersection of GST + TP + Income Tax on this complex topic. Pan-India, 100% digital.
📞 +91-9911369185 · ✉️ [email protected]
Disclaimer: Educational purposes only. Based on CGST Act 2017, CGST Rules 2017 (Rule 28(2) as amended w.e.f. 26 October 2023 and 10 July 2024), Circular 204/16/2023-GST (27 Oct 2023), Circular 225/19/2024-GST (11 Jul 2024), NN 52/2023-CT, NN 12/2024-CT, ITA 1961, ITA 2025 (effective TY 2026-27 i.e. 1 April 2026), CBDT Transfer Pricing Safe Harbour Rules, FEMA (Guarantees) Regulations 2000 as amended, as available up to May 2026. The legal position on GST taxability of letters of comfort and personal guarantees is evolving – consult a qualified GST practitioner for specific transaction advice.
