COMPANY LAW : Where there was an ‘inadvertent typographical error’ figuring in extract of ‘Minutes of Meeting’ characterizing ‘special resolution’ as ‘unanimous ordinary resolution’ and appellant company had tacitly admitted its creeping in of typographical error in extract of minutes, taking into consideration stand of Registrar of Companies that appellant/Company had filed special resolution with it, which satisfies requirement of section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013,COMPANY LAW : Where there was an ‘inadvertent typographical error’ figuring in extract of ‘Minutes of Meeting’ characterizing ‘special resolution’ as ‘unanimous ordinary resolution’ and appellant company had tacitly admitted its creeping in of typographical error in extract of minutes, taking into consideration stand of Registrar of Companies that appellant/Company had filed special resolution with it, which satisfies requirement of section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013,www.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More
