COMPANY LAWS : Where interim order passed by NCLT challenged in writ petition was not an administrative order passed by NCLT, Writ Court could not proceed to entertain writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution against said order; where dispute between company and its shareholders is purely a civil dispute, remedy under Article 226 is available against a State or authority or instrumentality of State, falling within ambit of definition “State” under Article 12 of ConstitutionCOMPANY LAWS : Where interim order passed by NCLT challenged in writ petition was not an administrative order passed by NCLT, Writ Court could not proceed to entertain writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution against said order; where dispute between company and its shareholders is purely a civil dispute, remedy under Article 226 is available against a State or authority or instrumentality of State, falling within ambit of definition “State” under Article 12 of Constitutionwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More
