‘UFO moviez’ abused dominance by restricting ‘DCE’ from playing films that weren’t processed by its subsidiary Co.

COMPETITION LAW : Where OP supplied Digital Cinema Equipment (DCE) on lease to cinema theatre owners and had disabled DCE from accepting or playing any cinematograph film which had not been post-production processed by its subsidiary company ‘S’, thereby causing exclusion of competitors of ‘S’ from market, same was in violation to provisions of sections 3 and 4 and, accordingly, DG was to be directed to investigation into matterCOMPETITION LAW : Where OP supplied Digital Cinema Equipment (DCE) on lease to cinema theatre owners and had disabled DCE from accepting or playing any cinematograph film which had not been post-production processed by its subsidiary company ‘S’, thereby causing exclusion of competitors of ‘S’ from market, same was in violation to provisions of sections 3 and 4 and, accordingly, DG was to be directed to investigation into matterwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More

Leave a Reply