Striking off of a Co.’s name by RoC without recording his satisfaction u/s 248(6) couldn’t be interfered with :HC

COMPANY LAW : Whether where appellant company was aggrieved as his name had been struck off by Registrar of Companies without recording his satisfaction in terms of section 248(6), just because there may be a mistake in order impugned or a different view was possible could not be good grounds for interference with under Article 227 of Constitution, despite existence of an alternative remedy of appealCOMPANY LAW : Whether where appellant company was aggrieved as his name had been struck off by Registrar of Companies without recording his satisfaction in terms of section 248(6), just because there may be a mistake in order impugned or a different view was possible could not be good grounds for interference with under Article 227 of Constitution, despite existence of an alternative remedy of appealwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More

Leave a Reply