COMPETITION LAW : Where due to presence of other private real estate service providers in relevant market for developing and sale of retirement homes in form of residential flats in Pune District, consumers were not dependent on OPs alone for provision of real estate services under consideration, OPs developer could not be said to be dominant in relevant market and therefore, question of abuse of dominant position within meaning of provisions of section 4 did not ariseCOMPETITION LAW : Where due to presence of other private real estate service providers in relevant market for developing and sale of retirement homes in form of residential flats in Pune District, consumers were not dependent on OPs alone for provision of real estate services under consideration, OPs developer could not be said to be dominant in relevant market and therefore, question of abuse of dominant position within meaning of provisions of section 4 did not arisewww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More
