COMPANY LAW : Where no documents had been shown or placed to establish that appellant company was carrying on business and filed forms even belatedly and there were no revival plans of company, RoC rightly struck off name of company under section 248(5) and, thus, there was no infirmity in order passed by NCLT dismissing application filed by appellant seeking restoration of name of company in register maintained by RoCCOMPANY LAW : Where no documents had been shown or placed to establish that appellant company was carrying on business and filed forms even belatedly and there were no revival plans of company, RoC rightly struck off name of company under section 248(5) and, thus, there was no infirmity in order passed by NCLT dismissing application filed by appellant seeking restoration of name of company in register maintained by RoCwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More
