HC obligates deputy RoC to explain reasons for shifting of complaint u/s 165 against director from Chennai to Coimbatore

COMPANY LAW : Where respondent-Deputy Registrar of Companies had filed a complaint before competent Court at Chennai against petitioner alleging violation of section 165 and thereafter, shifted said complaint to Coimbatore, respondent was obligated to explain reasons for same to Court at Coimbatore and Magistrate would take a call on accepting or rejecting those reasons; proceedings pending at Chennai was to be quashedCOMPANY LAW : Where respondent-Deputy Registrar of Companies had filed a complaint before competent Court at Chennai against petitioner alleging violation of section 165 and thereafter, shifted said complaint to Coimbatore, respondent was obligated to explain reasons for same to Court at Coimbatore and Magistrate would take a call on accepting or rejecting those reasons; proceedings pending at Chennai was to be quashedwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More

Leave a Reply