COMPETITION LAW : Where informant invested in hospitality project of OP and OP agreed to pay monthly rent of Rs. 14 thousand to informant and informant alleged that neither he received monthly rent nor refund of his money, in view of fact that said issues did not reveal any competition concern and same appeared to be purely individual consumer/contractual in nature, and as such remedies lie elsewhere and therefore information was to be closed against OPCOMPETITION LAW : Where informant invested in hospitality project of OP and OP agreed to pay monthly rent of Rs. 14 thousand to informant and informant alleged that neither he received monthly rent nor refund of his money, in view of fact that said issues did not reveal any competition concern and same appeared to be purely individual consumer/contractual in nature, and as such remedies lie elsewhere and therefore information was to be closed against OPwww.taxmann.com Latest Case LawsRead More
